www-dom-ts@w3.org from March 2002 by author

Arnold, Curt

• RE: DOMC Test Suite (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: Exit code (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: Tests in DOM-Test-Suite failing XML validity constraints. (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: DOM L1 HTML changes (Tuesday, 5 March)

Bjørn Vermo

• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)

Curt Arnold

• Re: Level 2 HTML Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Future Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• DOM3.DTD (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Minor fixes to submitted tests (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: How do I generate test suite code for C? (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: How do I generate test suite code for C? (Saturday, 16 March)
• Exit code, domimplementationfeaturenull, ATTLIST hasSize (Thursday, 14 March)
• EntityValueReplacement for HTML-Compatilble test (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: requesting basic sanity check (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: requesting basic sanity check (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: requesting basic sanity check (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Fw: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)
• HTML compatible staff substitutes (Friday, 8 March)
• Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Core HTML-compatible tests (was Re: Core HTML only tests) (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: DOM L1 HTML changes (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Start of HTML test loader (Monday, 4 March)
• DOM L1 HTML changes (Saturday, 2 March)
• Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Saturday, 2 March)
• Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Saturday, 2 March)
• Level 2 Core distribution target (Friday, 1 March)

Dimitris Dimitriadis

• [Documentation] Added Schema/Writing tests page to /DOM/test area (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Grant of License issue (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• [General] Updated documentation, added page pointing to implementations that have used DOM TS (Wednesday, 27 March)
• [Test submission] Netscape Level 1 HTML tests in CVS (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: [WG telcon resolutions] Level 2&3 schemas, transforms for non-official DOM bindings --Followup (Wednesday, 20 March)
• [WG telcon resolutions] Level 2&3 schemas, transforms for non-official DOM bindings (Wednesday, 20 March)
• [WG Resolution] Read only nodes (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: requesting basic sanity check (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: requesting basic sanity check (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: requesting basic sanity check (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Wednesday, 6 March)
• test, please ignore (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: DOM L1 HTML changes (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Monday, 4 March)
• Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Saturday, 2 March)

Fred L. Drake, Jr.

• Re: How should text be normalized for tests? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Monday, 18 March)

Jeroen van Rotterdam

• RE: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Wednesday, 20 March)

Joseph Kesselman

• Re: How should text be normalized for tests? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: How should text be normalized for tests? (Monday, 25 March)
• RE: DOM L1 HTML changes (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: DOM L1 HTML changes (Tuesday, 5 March)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: Grant of License issue (Wednesday, 27 March)

jvrdam@xs4all.nl

• ANN: X-Hive/DB 100% conformance to the DOM Level 1 Test Suite (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Writing DOM Level 3 Load & Save tests (Sunday, 24 March)

Laszlo Nemeth

• Exit code (Friday, 8 March)
• domimplementationfeaturenull (Thursday, 7 March)

Manos Batsis

• RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Monday, 11 March)
• RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)

Mary Brady

• Re: [Recap] Issues (Wednesday, 27 March)
• EntityValueReplacement for HTML-Compatilble test (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Fw: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Core HTML only tests (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Using existing staff.xml based tests with HTML processors (Wednesday, 6 March)

Michael B Allen

• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: DOMC Test Suite (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: How do I generate test suite code for C? (Sunday, 17 March)
• How do I generate test suite code for C? (Saturday, 16 March)

Michael B. Allen

• Re: How should text be normalized for tests? (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: How should text be normalized for tests? (Tuesday, 26 March)
• How should text be normalized for tests? (Monday, 25 March)
• DOMC Test Suite (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: assertEquals in C (Saturday, 23 March)
• assertEquals in C (Friday, 22 March)

Nick Efthymiou

• Tests in DOM-Test-Suite failing XML validity constraints. (Sunday, 3 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: Future Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Future Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Grant of License issue (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Monday, 11 March)

Ray Whitmer

• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future (Wednesday, 6 March)

Rick Rivello

• Re: Level 2 HTML Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Level 2 HTML Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Future Tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: How should text be normalized for tests? (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Tests that depend on node being inserted for default attributes (Tuesday, 12 March)
• DOM Level1 HTML Added (Friday, 1 March)

Sivakiran Tummala

• requesting basic sanity check (Tuesday, 12 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 March 2002 10:46:50 UTC