Re: Issues brought up in the DOM WG and general principles for the future

• From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:39:53 +0100
• To: "Curt Arnold" <carnold@houston.rr.com>
• Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <2064BE2B-2FC9-11D6-966D-000393556882@ontologicon.com>

I brought up the issue, but I still think we should anticipate that 
submitted tests are in the XML DOMTS format in order to allow for 
generating both bindings. Do you think the advantage of having tests 
submitted in a particular language outweighs the design we currently 
have?


>
>> DOM WG: I (again) raised the issue of having to get more tests 
>> submitted
>> from member companies, especially as we want to move along as a WG to
>> reach Recommendation of DOM level 3. The DOM WG members promised to 
>> look
>> into this and try to allocate resources. I also brought the issue that
>> there have been very limited resources working on the DOM TS to the DOM
>> WG's attention, indicating that this cannot continue indefinitely if we
>> want to ensure some sound quality requirements for the DOM TS.
>
> Making any existing tests (in whatever language) available would be a 
> great
> help.
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 18:38:35 UTC