- From: Michael B. Allen <mballen@erols.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 05:17:45 -0500
- To: "Michael B. Allen" <mballen@erols.com>
- Cc: carnold@houston.rr.com, www-dom-ts@w3.org
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:45:38 -0500 "Michael B. Allen" <mballen@erols.com> wrote: > > > o The assertions assume certain type evaluations can be made like > > > assertEquals might warrant == or strcmp. > > > > Since the transform is aware of the types of the arguments, it is pretty > > easy for the transform to produce assertEqualsString, assertEqualInt, etc. > > I'd prefer that over trying to inline the comparison with an strcmp. > > Actually it's not aware of the argument types. *Actually* it's still possible to get to these types so all is going well. False alarm :~) -- May The Source be with you.
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2002 05:11:36 UTC