- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:57:42 +0100
- To: "Mary Brady" <mbrady@nist.gov>
- Cc: "Curt Arnold" <carnold@houston.rr.com>, <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
I think the safest thing then is to make them available from the DOM TS page. I'll put a link to them from the main page and put them in the www.w3.org/DOM/Test area /Dimitris >>> Level 2/3 >>> 1. Following X-Hive's intent to write tests, we said we would generate >>> the DOM TS ML for levels 2 & 3. This would greatly simplify for >>> companies looking into writing tests for current implementations. >> >> >> DOM L2 schemas have been available for quite some time. >> > > [mb] And in fact, Rick has been using them quite successfully. Maybe > we should make it clear that they are available -- I'd hate to think > that folks are willing to write tests for L2 and this is stopping them! > >> I've committed changes to build.xml, dom-to-xsd.xsl and corresponding >> patches that allow building a DOM L3 schema. There are still some >> rough >> edges, I've posted a hand finished copy of a dom3.xsd and a modified > version >> of Jeroen's sample L/S test to >> http://home.houston.rr.com/curta/dom3.ZIP >> >> There are still a few issues, I haven't reworked the keys and keyrefs >> to >> account for anonymous inner classes, so you will get spurious keyref >> constraint validations when accessing variables defined in anonymous >> inner >> classes. There are several interfaces missing, CDATASection and >> Entity, > for >> example, not sure why they disappeared. Text is still DOM L2 since the > XML >> sources omitted it and TextEvent. Would be really nice if the next >> round > of >> DOM specs were validated. >> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 08:57:49 UTC