typo in http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#rfc2119keywords
What is a valid WSDL component model?
Bug in RPC Signature Extension Schema
Editorial: Part 2, XML Namespace Table
Editorial: Part 1, Introduction
editorial: part 2 section 2 beginning
POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded serializatin
LC ISSUE: Editorial points
Typos
Comments on WSDL SOAP Binding Extension section of Adjuncts from WS-Addressing WG
WSDL 2.0 LC Comments, specifically LC issue 76d
RE: HTTP binding: defaultTransferCoding typo
RE: HTTP binding: Part 2 section 6.3 Default Binding Rules clarification
RE: SOAP and HTTP bindings: {parent} property for nested components
RE: SOAP and HTTP bindings: Editorial reorganization for defaults
RE: HTTP binding: Misalignment between IRI style and application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization, and between Multipart style and multipart/form-data serialization
RE: RPC style: an example defines a type
RE: Part 2: introduction is incomplete
RE: Part 2: Mapping from XML Representations to Component Properties
RE: Predefined MEPs: typo in the definition
RE: What is the extension type system URI?
RE: Part 1: use of ws namespace prefix
RE: Incomplete list of operation styles in Part 1
RE: Identification of an interface operation
RE: Description's {type definitions} mapping
RE: Definition of the wsdlx namespace
FW: Notational conventions
RE: URI comparison reference
RE: Infoset refs
limitations of {http output serialization}
fault serialization
fault serialization
LC ISSUE from WSA: Clarify applicability of wsdx:Interface and wsdx:Binding
simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0
- RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0
- RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0
- RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0
- RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0
- RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0