- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:13:13 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC318 [1]. The Working Group agreed to reorganize sections with *default attributes, using 6.10 as a model of excellence. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC318 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:12 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: SOAP and HTTP bindings: Editorial reorganization for defaults > > Defaults in the bindings are inconsistently defined. > > The bindings have: > - a default binding rules section: > 5. WSDL SOAP Binding Extension > 5.3 Default Binding Rules > 6. WSDL HTTP Binding Extension > 6.3 Default Binding Rules > - sections for other defaults: > 5.6 Specifying the Default SOAP MEP > 6.5 Specifying the Default HTTP Method > - other sections defining their own defaults: > 6.6 Binding Operations > (defines queryParameterSeparatorDefault) > 6.10 Specifying the Transfer Coding > (defines transferCodingDefault) > > I would like to propose to have each @foobarDefault consistently > defined in its own subsection under 5.3 Default Binding Rules and 6.3 > Default Binding Rules, or have them consistently defined in the > section where they're used for determining the value of a property > (like sections 6.6 or 6.10). > > I prefer those two proposed solutions to having them as subsections of > the the binding definition (like 5.6 and 6.5) as I believe that it > gives as much important to setting a default, which does not directly > impact the component, as to say binding an operation, which is much > more substantial. > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 19:14:03 UTC