FW: Notational conventions

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC305 [1].  The Working Group agreed to fix the
issue per [2].

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC305
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0010.html

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:12 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Notational conventions

The WS-A WG has added a statement "Pseudo schemas do not include
extensibility points for brevity" to their notational conventions [1].
Except for that new statement, that text is identical to ours [2]. I
believe it would be beneficial to add the statement to our notational
conventions section(s) as well.

I propose this be treated editorial and done prior to LC publication.
But if it doesn't happen we'll track it as an editorial issue during the
next LC.


Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 18:58:24 UTC