- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:57:43 -0700
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC305 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the issue per [2]. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC305 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0010.html -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:12 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Notational conventions The WS-A WG has added a statement "Pseudo schemas do not include extensibility points for brevity" to their notational conventions [1]. Except for that new statement, that text is identical to ours [2]. I believe it would be beneficial to add the statement to our notational conventions section(s) as well. I propose this be treated editorial and done prior to LC publication. But if it doesn't happen we'll track it as an editorial issue during the next LC. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-core.html ?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#notation [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html#bnfp seudoschemas
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 18:58:24 UTC