- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:59:37 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC306 [1]. The Working Group agreed to editorial improvements to address the issue. See [1] for a detailed resolution. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC306 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:21 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Definition of the wsdlx namespace > > This is an editorial comment which impacts both Part 1 and 2. > > Part 1 says: > > wsdlx > > "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/wsdl-extensions" > > Defined by this specification 3.3 Describing Messages that > Refer > to Services and Endpoints. > > Actually, only part of wsdlx is defined in this section, @wsdlx:safe > being defined in Part 2. > > In Part 2, Table 1-1 lists a "wsdl-x" prefix. This should be "wsdlx". > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 18:59:57 UTC