- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:15:18 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC322 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the problem as you suggest. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC322 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:14 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: HTTP binding: Part 2 section 6.3 Default Binding Rules > clarification > > This is an editorial comment. > > In Part 2, section 6.3 Default Binding Rules reads: > > Note: > > The application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization format > places > constraints on the stype of the interface operation bound (see > 6.9.1 > Serialization as application/x-www-form-urlencoded ). > > There's a typo ("stype"), and it would be more precise to say: > > The application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization format places > constraints on the XML Schema definition of the {element > declaration} property of the Interface Message Reference components > of the Interface Operation component bound (see 6.9.1 Serialization > as application/x-www-form-urlencoded ). > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 19:15:30 UTC