- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:15:18 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC322 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the
problem as you suggest.
If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC322
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:14 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: HTTP binding: Part 2 section 6.3 Default Binding Rules
> clarification
>
> This is an editorial comment.
>
> In Part 2, section 6.3 Default Binding Rules reads:
>
> Note:
>
> The application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization format
> places
> constraints on the stype of the interface operation bound (see
> 6.9.1
> Serialization as application/x-www-form-urlencoded ).
>
> There's a typo ("stype"), and it would be more precise to say:
>
> The application/x-www-form-urlencoded serialization format places
> constraints on the XML Schema definition of the {element
> declaration} property of the Interface Message Reference components
> of the Interface Operation component bound (see 6.9.1 Serialization
> as application/x-www-form-urlencoded ).
>
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 19:15:30 UTC