public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from March 2022: by author

Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Friday, 11 March)
autokagami via GitHub
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: [mediacapture-handle-identity] Align with Web IDL specification (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: [mediacapture-handle-actions] Align with Web IDL specification (Wednesday, 23 March)
Bernard Aboba via GitHub
- [mediacapture-handle] Tab capture restriction (#43) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity][Enhancement] Expose contentHint (#35) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98) (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] SVC getCapabilities() is redundant with Media Capabilities query (#49) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Friday, 4 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Thursday, 3 March)
Bigi Lui via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Controlling 3rd party iframe audio output on a page? (#63) (Thursday, 3 March)
Brad Isbell via GitHub
- [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices() should request permission (#874) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Dan Jenkins via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98) (Tuesday, 22 March)
Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix WebIDL for constructor (#45) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Fix WebIDL for constructor (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 32.1.0 (Monday, 21 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 32.1.0 (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Actions section from January WebRTC interim (#15) (Friday, 18 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#212) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#212) (Friday, 18 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 32.0.1 (Monday, 14 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 32.0.1 (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30) (Thursday, 10 March)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to ReSpec version 31.0.11 (Monday, 7 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version 31.0.11 (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Document substantive changes since Rec as candidate amendments (#2713) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Elad Alon via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Fix ReSpec - conformance section (#39) (Thursday, 31 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Fix ReSpec - conformance section (Thursday, 31 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Advance document to FPWD (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] s/HTMLElement/Element (#35) (Thursday, 31 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: s/HTMLElement/Element (Thursday, 31 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget and cropTo algorithms should be based on existing HTML/CSS definitions (#20) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should be made serializable (#21) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Thursday, 31 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: s/HTMLElement/Element (Thursday, 31 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Fix formatting (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Decisions concerning clones (#2) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] Decisions concerning clones (#2) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is BrowserCaptureMediaStreamTrack needed? (#10) (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Use case 1 presumes tight integration (#4) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Friday, 25 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] cropTo is returning promises but it is unclear when promises are supposed to be rejected synchronously or not (#14) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] Timing of cropTo promise resolution with media capture-transform (#12) (Thursday, 24 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Delete identity/README.md (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Tab capture restriction (#43) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Specify requirement of exposure: tab-capture (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Define DisplayMediaStreamConstraints.currentTabPreference (Tuesday, 22 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove the "application" DisplayCaptureSurfaceType (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Remove the "application" DisplayCaptureSurfaceType (#214) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove the "application" DisplayCaptureSurfaceType (Tuesday, 22 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify 1024 16-bit characters limitation in setCaptureHandleConfig (#33) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Monday, 21 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Expose CropTarget in Workers (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Monday, 21 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Synchronous/asynchronous Promise rejection (Friday, 18 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Document issues with no consensus (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Document points of no consensus (#26) (Friday, 18 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Document points of no consensus (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probable be exposed to worker (#25) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget and cropTo algorithms should be based on existing HTML/CSS definitions (#20) (Friday, 18 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Statement of Support from Citrix (#14) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Statement of Support from Citrix (#14) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Actions] "Actions" model should be aligned with "mediasession actions" (#36) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Actions section from January WebRTC interim (#15) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget and cropTo algorithms should be based on existing HTML/CSS definitions (#20) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] Remove language related to muting cropped tracks (#22) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Use the displaySurface constraint to signal application preference (#186) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Revisit: Let getDisplayMedia() influence the default type choice in the picker (#184) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-handle] Integrate the Actions compromise presented at January WebRTC interim (#6) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Integrate the Actions compromise presented at January WebRTC interim (#6) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Use case for actions: Presentation automation (#37) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] PR Preview doesn't appear to support multiple documents. (#29) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Monday, 14 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Improvement: Expose contentHint (#35) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Friday, 11 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update Identity to reflect adoption (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Specify 1024 16-bit characters limitation in setCaptureHandleConfig (#33) (Thursday, 10 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Specify 1024 16-bit characters limitation in setCaptureHandleConfig (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Jan-Ivar as an editor for Identity (#20) (Thursday, 10 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Add Jan-Ivar as an editor for Identity (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Jan-Ivar as an editor for Identity (#20) (Thursday, 10 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Actions editors (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update link for filing feedback (not WICG anymore) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Make CropTarget serializable (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Specify sub-type requirement for cloning tracks (#864) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Remove discussion of mute (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is muting track the right call for empty cropped tracks (#9) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update Origin Trial token (Monday, 7 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update captured.html (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Monday, 7 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Specify sub-type requirement for cloning tracks (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Freddy Daniel via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Controlling 3rd party iframe audio output on a page? (#63) (Thursday, 3 March)
guidou via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Friday, 18 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Use case for actions: Presentation automation (#37) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] "Actions" model should be aligned with "mediasession actions" (#36) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Add Actions section from January WebRTC interim (#15) (Thursday, 10 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Fix permissions on repo (#30) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is muting track the right call for empty cropped tracks (#9) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Tuesday, 1 March)
henbos via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Actions] "Actions" model should be aligned with "mediasession actions" (#36) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Statement of Support from Citrix (#14) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Closed: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Update Actions spec status to ED (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should Identity and Actions be in separate repos? (#38) (Thursday, 17 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Clarify this describes a mechanism for tab capture only (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] [Identity] Limit to tab-capture. (#10) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Clarify behavior of getParameters() (#68) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] sdpFmtpLine prose is vague about which SDP to use (#2710) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Multi-capture (concurrent capture of multiple surfaces) (#204) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] .getCaptureHandle() seems misplaced on the track (#12) (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (#28) (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16) (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Split doc into identity.html and actions.html (#16) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] PR Preview doesn't appear to support multiple documents. (#29) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Wednesday, 9 March)
- [mediacapture-handle] Pull Request: Restore actions/index.html use-case & rename sub-READMEs to explainer.md (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] How does generator.mute change track states? (#81) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Jesper van den Ende via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100) (Wednesday, 23 March)
John Davis via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Ability to persist RTCPeerconnection connection state (#101) (Monday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-extensions] Ability to persist RTCPeerconnection connection state (#101) (Monday, 21 March)
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec-hooks requested (#213) (Tuesday, 22 March)
lghall via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-region] [Region capture] Statement of support from Google (#31) (Tuesday, 22 March)
Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: slightly better use of ReSpec stuff (Monday, 7 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: link up add/remove track defs (Monday, 7 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Editorial: fix dual definition of permission strings (Monday, 7 March)
Mike Taylor via GitHub
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Remove responsible doc (Tuesday, 15 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Replace usage of "responsible document" (#871) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Monday, 14 March)
- [mediacapture-output] Pull Request: Editorial: use associated Document in place of responsible document (Monday, 14 March)
Paul Gregoire via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102) (Tuesday, 22 March)
Philipp Hancke via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Ability to persist RTCPeerconnection connection state (#101) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Disabling hardware acceleration (#98) (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Video with audio element pause after play during phone call (#869) (Wednesday, 9 March)
Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] 'label' needs direction and language metadata (#665) (Friday, 25 March)
Sergio Garcia Murillo via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102) (Monday, 21 March)
- [webrtc-extensions] Add support for negotiating datachannels in SDP (RFC8864) (#102) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Thursday, 17 March)
- [webrtc-extensions] Allow having inactive by default codecs (#100) (Wednesday, 16 March)
trouba via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Video with audio element pause after play during phone call (#869) (Thursday, 10 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Video with audio element pause after play during phone call (#869) (Wednesday, 9 March)
Varun Singh via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-stats] outbound-rtp.scaleResolutionDownBy (#620) (Tuesday, 8 March)
Yoav Weiss via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-handle] Don't reinvent postMessage (#11) (Wednesday, 9 March)
youennf via GitHub
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Define serialization steps (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (#32) (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Add a note stating the intent to get consistency between cropTo promise resolution and enqueueuing in the ReadableStream (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Pull Request: Refer to getBoundingClientRect as a defintion of the actual crop area (Wednesday, 23 March)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add source specific handling for creation and cloning of tracks (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Why expose produceCropTarget at MediaDevices level? (#11) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be available to Elements and not only HTMLElements (#13) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probably be exposed to worker (#25) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Monday, 21 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Definition of valid CropTarget might be too loose (#29) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24) (Thursday, 17 March)
- [mediacapture-region] CropTarget should probable be exposed to worker (#25) (Thursday, 17 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#212) (Thursday, 17 March)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Beef up privacy and security section with regards to the various risks related to the different surfaces (#211) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Friday, 11 March)
- [mediacapture-region] Remove language related to muting cropped tracks (#22) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] What makes CropTarget special to require an asynchronous creation? (#17) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-region] Is CropTarget name too generic? (#18) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Conditional Focus (When Display-Capture Starts) (#190) (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Avoid Hall-of-Mirrors (#209) (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Specify sub-type requirement for cloning tracks (#864) (Thursday, 3 March)

public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from March 2022 by author