- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 18:01:10 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Reporting from my discussion with @plehegar : * having a document which integrates seamlessly the candidate (or in the future, proposed) amendments in the normative text is not a priori compatible with the intent of the process * potential approaches to explore as alternatives that would keep low-editorial friction: * generate two documents: a default one with only the "candidate correction" annotations, but not the actual changes, and an informative view where the candidate changes are merged in * find a way to provide the two views into a single document (similar to the current approach used by other amended recs with `ins`/`del`), but with a much coarser granularity (e.g. at the section level rather than the phrase or in-phrase diff level) I'll iterate in that direction (probably starting with the latter that would avoid creating confusing doppelgangers) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dontcallmedom Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/2713#issuecomment-1055709172 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2022 18:01:12 UTC