Re: [webrtc-pc] Document substantive changes since Rec as candidate amendments (#2713)

Reporting from my discussion with @plehegar :
* having a document which integrates seamlessly the candidate (or in the future, proposed) amendments in the normative text is not a priori compatible with the intent of the process
* potential approaches to explore as alternatives that would keep low-editorial friction:
  * generate two documents: a default one with only the "candidate correction" annotations, but not the actual changes, and an informative view where the candidate changes are merged in
  * find a way to provide the two views into a single document (similar to the current approach used by other amended recs with `ins`/`del`), but with a much coarser granularity (e.g. at the section level rather than the phrase or in-phrase diff level)

I'll iterate in that direction (probably starting with the latter that would avoid creating confusing doppelgangers)

GitHub Notification of comment by dontcallmedom
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2022 18:01:12 UTC