- From: henbos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:07:54 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Privacy and security: I'm not saying audio-only capture is necessarily better or worse from a privacy and security perspective, but it may be different enough to be worth revisting if the privacy and security versus use cases trade-off is still worth it. - Unlike screen sharing, audio-only capture might not be as clear to the user that capturing is happening or what is being captured. - Unlike screen sharing, audio-only capture is much more limited in use cases. I'm personally having trouble coming up with convincing ones. But even if that is resolved: doing an API that only works on some OSes, or that works different on different OSes, seems controversial in and of itself. - So I we should have some really strong use cases for this... what are they? Btw I agree that doing audio+video capture when you only want audio is counterproductive - it's a workaround to not having solved the audio-only capture use case. But the question is: do we want to solve this use case? I would start with "what use cases do we want to solve?" -- GitHub Notification of comment by henbos Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/issues/100#issuecomment-1081492225 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2022 07:07:55 UTC