> As [mentioned](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/pull/32#issuecomment-1080798232), if you have examples of such "weak references" being employed elsewhere, then we can fall in with this pattern. Otherwise, I think a less controversial phrasing is preferable. Do you have such examples? Given GC should not be observable, whether weak or not is not a hard requirement, it is a clarification. If you do not like weak (I am not sure why), I am fine reverting to the original PR: no mention of weak but a GC note. As of objects referencing other objects that are potentially in other process, this is an existing pattern that proved to work well, let's use it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by youennf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/pull/24#issuecomment-1081975698 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Tuesday, 29 March 2022 14:56:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:56 UTC