W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > March 2022

Re: [mediacapture-region] Make CropTarget serializable (#24)

From: Elad Alon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:44:59 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1081962074-1648565096-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> FWIW, the web is full of well dealt with relationships between objects from different origins, living in potentially different processes which have security implications.

As mentioned, if you have examples of such "weak references" being employed elsewhere, then we can fall in with this pattern. Otherwise, I think a less controversial phrasing is preferable. Do you have such examples?

> An important part of the standardisation is to cross check and make sure we are all on the same page after this work.
> In other words, do not trust me and please cross-check ;o)

Apologies, I could have phrased things more directly. I am saying - I agree to throw on `forStorage` under our mutual understanding that this does not relate to stringification. (It is unfortunate that `forStorage` is not documented better. I am writing this 2022-03-29. Hopefully [this](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/structured-data.html#structuredserializeinternal) is improved in the future.)

GitHub Notification of comment by eladalon1983
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-region/pull/24#issuecomment-1081962074 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2022 14:45:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:56 UTC