public-script-coord@w3.org from January to March 2013 by thread

[Bug 21422] New: Futures bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 28 March)

[WebIDL] editorial: unrestricted double and precision Dirk Schulze (Friday, 22 March)

IDL: number types Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 19 March)

[Bug 21295] New: overload resolution: are DOMString and sequence<T> distinguishable now? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 14 March)

Contextual auto-escaping corner cases Mike Samuel (Thursday, 14 March)

E4H compatible with string templates Mike Samuel (Thursday, 14 March)

[Bug 21270] New: Introduce syntax for getters that keep returning the same object bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Wednesday, 13 March)

[Bug 17749] [WebIDL] Nit: "unrestricted double type" defined as 32-bit bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 12 March)

[Bug 21251] New: Typos: double/unrestricted double describing "float" (copy/paste error) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Monday, 11 March)

html template string handler WAS: E4H and constructing DOMs Ojan Vafai (Monday, 11 March)

A design for Futures/Promises in DOM Alex Russell (Thursday, 7 March)

E4H and constructing DOMs Ojan Vafai (Thursday, 7 March)

Why do we allow overloads on legacycallers? Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 4 March)

New ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification draft Norbert Lindenberg (Friday, 1 March)

Standardizing console APIs: Where? Brian Kardell (Friday, 22 February)

[Bug 21076] New: Remove _-escape mechanism for identifiers bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 21073] New: merge [Unforgeable] and readonly into unforgeable bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 21069] New: [Unforgeable] attributes as data property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 21 February)

[Bug 21048] New: Broken Links to ES6 Draft bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)

How to represent at key-value map in WebIDL Adam Bergkvist (Wednesday, 13 February)

Checking for (JSON) serialisable object Marcos Caceres (Monday, 11 February)

Re: [cssom] Proposal for obtaining robust style information via Javascript - getStyle() Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 6 February)

Interaction between WebIDL operations and ES6 proxies David Bruant (Thursday, 31 January)

[Bug 20836] New: What happens when a dictionary references itself? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 31 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20777] New: Getting a property from the global scope polluter ends up in an infinite loop bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 25 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20441] algorithms not marked as such bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Wednesday, 23 January)

[Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Wednesday, 23 January)

[Bug 20737] New: "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)

[Bug 20735] New: n not defined in sequence algorithm bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)

[Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)

[Bug 20441] algorithms not marked as such bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)

[Bug 20731] New: Sequence algorithm seems incorrect bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)

[Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)

Fwd: [IndexedDB] Event handlers David Bruant (Monday, 21 January)

Web IDL exceptions Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 18 January)

[Bug 20653] New: Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Saturday, 12 January)

[webidl.js] Implement the any type François REMY (Thursday, 10 January)

[Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Monday, 7 January)

Re: [whatwg] Need to define same-origin policy for WebIDL operations/getters/setters Cameron McCormack (Monday, 7 January)

[Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Monday, 7 January)

[Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Saturday, 5 January)

[Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Saturday, 5 January)

[Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Saturday, 5 January)

[Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 4 January)

[Bug 20562] New: Objects supporting indexed properties bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 4 January)

[Bug 20561] New: Objects supporting indexed properties bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 4 January)

[Bug 20560] New: misplaced comma bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 4 January)

[Bug 20559] New: Typo in sequence conversion algo bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 4 January)

[Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 3 January)

Solving the "how do I tell whether I have an HTML element?" (or image element, or whatever) problem Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 1 January)

Re: [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters Garrett Smith (Tuesday, 1 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 March 2013 16:08:24 UTC