W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2013

[Bug 20735] n not defined in sequence algorithm

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:15:51 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20735-3890-5l7pqEC9Km@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> sure, but it's more consistant with the other algorithms if n is explicitly
> defined in the algorithm itself.

My intent was to use "blah_0..n-1" for list variables that algorithms use, and
not for IDL values like sequences.  So I've changed the three instances of
"blah_0..n-1" that name or define IDL sequence values, but I'll leave the
remaining ~10 uses of "blah_0..n-1" without an preceding definition of n when
they're naming/defining lists.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 07:15:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:08 UTC