Why do we allow overloads on legacycallers?

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
• Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 13:08:35 -0500
• To: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <5134E323.5090308@mit.edu>

It looks to me like none of the existing legacycaller consumers need 
overloads.  Given that, why do we want to allow overloads on 
legacycaller at all?

-Boris

Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 18:09:04 UTC