- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:40:53 -0400
- To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > This is kind of a meta-question, but is the purpose of IDL types for C++ implementers or for JavaScript consumers? Both in certain browser engines. > should only be a single number type (aka "Number"). Well, we would still want a distinction between floating point, integer, non-negative integer, floating point without Infinity, -Infinity, or NaN, ... I do agree we should have new types in coordination with TC39 that match that model better and see where we can migrate existing unsigned long to unsigned number (or some such). -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:41:22 UTC