- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:07:34 +1100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>, "extensiblewebwebidl.js" <reply+i-9734213-995692b9a7a2220a2d186a9d4ca28890d7904718-364405@reply.github.co>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
François REMY: >> My belief is that the specification should have referenced the >> "4.2.15 unrestricted double" algorithm instead. Anne van Kesteren: > Yeah it's a bug. unrestricted double is new and originally double > had the semantics of unrestricted double. Yep, fixed now, thanks.
Received on Saturday, 12 January 2013 02:04:17 UTC