- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:59:00 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20836 --- Comment #4 from François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> --- Okay, thanks for the check. Actually, it makes sense. However, I'm still not completely secured: even if we add something smart enough to restrict value-type loops in the WebIDL graph, you can't avoid the 'any' type to cause the same issue, right? Are there any dictionary out there with an 'any' or 'object' field? If not, we could simply mark it invalid, too and I can just decide that I can safely ignore this problem as it's impossible to get into this situation. In fact, I can do it even if it's actually possible but I would feel dirty ^_^ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 17:59:01 UTC