- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:11:19 +0100
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: "extensiblewebwebidl.js" <reply+i-9734213-995692b9a7a2220a2d186a9d4ca28890d7904718-364405@reply.github.co>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "cam@mcc.id.au" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:01 PM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > My belief is that the specification should have referenced the "4.2.15 unrestricted double" algorithm instead. Yeah it's a bug. unrestricted double is new and originally double had the semantics of unrestricted double. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 11:11:47 UTC