On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:01 PM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > My belief is that the specification should have referenced the "4.2.15 unrestricted double" algorithm instead. Yeah it's a bug. unrestricted double is new and originally double had the semantics of unrestricted double. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 11:11:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:08 UTC