- From: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:29:28 -0800
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: public-script-coord@w3.org
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 1/1/13 2:08 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: >> Private reply: LOL, no worries. >> >> Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>> 1) Hack instanceof as Gecko has in the past. This is actually a bit >>> of a pain to implement even in Gecko, without changes to SpiderMonkey, >>> because function objects can't have the magic behavior the RHS needs >>> above in SpiderMonkey at the moment. >> >> What's missing? I still see Class::hasInstance in jsclass.h. > > Functions can't have a custom JSClass in SpiderMonkey. They always > have js::FunctionClass. IIRC our DOM interface objects used to have custom JSClasses -- no more? Required by WebIDL or rather our implementation choice? I'm interested in rationales. Oh, and HNY! /be
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2013 18:34:23 UTC