W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > January to March 2013

[Bug 20735] n not defined in sequence algorithm

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:01:35 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20735-3890-AMLcPSTfkw@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #4 from Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > sure, but it's more consistant with the other algorithms if n is explicitly
> > defined in the algorithm itself.
> My intent was to use "blah_0..n-1" for list variables that algorithms use,
> and not for IDL values like sequences.  So I've changed the three instances
> of "blah_0..n-1" that name or define IDL sequence values, but I'll leave the
> remaining ~10 uses of "blah_0..n-1" without an preceding definition of n
> when they're naming/defining lists.

mkay, but note that the 0..n-1 seems overly fancy (when you are already working
on n in the algorithms) and it's already confused me during implementation.
Please try to avoid unnecessary "mathematical-looking" constructs in the spec
to keep the spec as easy to read as possible.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 14:01:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:08 UTC