public-rif-wg@w3.org from February 2008 by date

Friday, 29 February 2008

• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Axel Polleres
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Michael Kifer
• deliverables table Sandro Hawke
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Axel Polleres
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Michael Kifer
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Michael Kifer
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Axel Polleres
• Re: namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Michael Kifer
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Gary Hallmark
• namespace prefix definitions in presentation syntax Axel Polleres
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Michael Kifer
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Michael Kifer
• regrets for next telecon (2008-03-04) Axel Polleres
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Jos de Bruijn
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Jos de Bruijn
• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Michael Kifer

Thursday, 28 February 2008

• Re: Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Gary Hallmark
• Grammar presentation syntax FLD and BLD Jos de Bruijn

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

• Re: RIF F2F10 Quick Poll Sandro Hawke
• Re: RIF F2F10 Quick Poll Axel Polleres
• RIF F2F10 Quick Poll Sandro Hawke
• F2F9 Minutes - please clean up Sandro Hawke
• what does this test case entail? Gary Hallmark

Tuesday, 26 February 2008

• RE: [Admin] No formal telecon today (but if you want to chat...) Boley, Harold
• [Admin] No formal telecon today (but if you want to chat...) Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: RIF test cases Michael Kifer

Sunday, 24 February 2008

• Comments on the 2/19 SWC doc (mostly proofreading type) Stella Mitchell
• Re: RIF test cases Sandro Hawke
• Re: RIF test cases Gary Hallmark

Friday, 22 February 2008

• RIF test cases Sandro Hawke
• Test case query format Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: RIF testcases API (non-normative) Axel Polleres
• RIF testcases API (non-normative) Axel Polleres
• Re: finalize F2F10 proposals Axel Polleres
• Re: finalize F2F10 proposals Igor Mozetic
• finalize F2F10 proposals Sandro Hawke
• Re: ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... Dave Reynolds
• Re: ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... Axel Polleres
• Re: ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... Michael Kifer
• Aggregates Hassan Aït-Kaci

Thursday, 21 February 2008

• ACTION-432: ugly ill-formed literals use case... Axel Polleres
• "deification" use case Axel Polleres

Wednesday, 20 February 2008

• ACTION-420 Review of SW-compatibility Axel Polleres
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD Gary Hallmark
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD Gary Hallmark
• RE: a "modest proposal" for PRD Paul Vincent
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD Hassan Aït-Kaci
• a "modest proposal" for PRD Gary Hallmark

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

• Comments on 2/19 version of RIF-FLD Stella Mitchell
• reading list snapshots Sandro Hawke
• Re: PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: PRD review, part 1 Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: PRD review,Part III, sections 3,4,5 Christian de Sainte Marie
• [Fwd: Re: PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions] Christian de Sainte Marie
• Minutes of telecon 12/02/08 Jeff Z. Pan
• BLD review (ACTION 421) Leora Morgenstern
• Re: PRD review - Part 1 Syntax of Condition Language Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review Jos de Bruijn
• RE: PRD review, part 1 and 2 Patrick Albert
• Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 19 February Dave Reynolds

Monday, 18 February 2008

• Re: PRD review, part 1 and 2 Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review Dave Reynolds
• Re: RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review Jos de Bruijn
• RIF RDF and OWL compatibility - mini review Dave Reynolds
• Re: [F2F9] Register *now*! (If you did not yet) Sandro Hawke
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 19 February Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: BLD mini-review Dave Reynolds
• [F2F9] Attendees: special requirements, anyone? Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: BLD mini-review Adrian Giurca
• Re: BLD mini-review Dave Reynolds
• [F2F9] Register *now*! (If you did not yet) Christian de Sainte Marie
• BLD mini-review Dave Reynolds
• FLD mini-review Dave Reynolds

Saturday, 16 February 2008

• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki Michael Kifer
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki Sandro Hawke
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki Michael Kifer
• PRD review,Part III, sections 3,4,5 Adrian Paschke
• PRD review, part 2 Operational Semantics of Conditions Adrian Paschke
• Re: PRD review, part 2 Michael Kifer
• Re: PRD review, part 1 Michael Kifer
• Re: [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki Michael Kifer
• Re: PRD review, part 1 Gary Hallmark
• PRD review, part 2 Gary Hallmark

Friday, 15 February 2008

• Re: PRD review, part 1 Christian de Sainte Marie
• PRD review - Part 1 Syntax of Condition Language Adrian Paschke
• Re: moving TRs to MediaWiki Sandro Hawke
• moving TRs to MediaWiki Sandro Hawke
• mediawiki "locked down" Sandro Hawke
• Regrets: 19th Feb Dave Reynolds
• PRD review, part 1 Gary Hallmark
• Re: [BLD] Actions on Specification and Builtins Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 14 February 2008

• [BLD] Actions on Specification and Builtins Boley, Harold
• Re: FLD review Michael Kifer
• Re: FLD review Igor Mozetic
• Re: BLD review Michael Kifer
• Re: FLD review Michael Kifer

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

• Frozen version RIF RDF and OWL compatibility for F2F9 Jos de Bruijn
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) Michael Kifer
• Re: [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki Christian de Sainte Marie
• BLD review Igor Mozetic
• FLD review Igor Mozetic
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) Adrian Giurca

Tuesday, 12 February 2008

• list constructor Michael Kifer
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) Michael Kifer
• Re: new BLD and the framework (FLD) Adrian Giurca
• [F2F] ACTION-410 complete Christian de Sainte Marie
• FLD/BLD cleanup Michael Kifer

Monday, 11 February 2008

• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 12 February Christian de Sainte Marie
• [PRD] New version of RIF-PRD on the wiki Christian de Sainte Marie

Saturday, 9 February 2008

• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Michael Kifer
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Michael Kifer
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Michael Kifer
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Boley, Harold
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Boley, Harold
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Jos de Bruijn
• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Boley, Harold
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Jos de Bruijn
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Michael Kifer

Friday, 8 February 2008

• RE: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Boley, Harold
• Re: [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Michael Kifer
• [BLD] comments on the semantics of lists Jos de Bruijn
• Re: Annotations and metadata in RIF Jos de Bruijn

Thursday, 7 February 2008

• Re: call for reviewers Dave Reynolds
• CFP: EuroPLop'08 Focus Group on Complex Event and Rule Patterns Adrian Paschke
• new BLD and the framework (FLD) Michael Kifer

Tuesday, 5 February 2008

• Re: call for reviewers Adrian Giurca
• [RIF][Admin] Minutes Telecon 5 February 2008 Boley, Harold
• call for reviewers Chris Welty
• [Fwd: my personal reply to (Re: comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG)] Chris Welty
• AW: Minutes from January 29, 2008, telecon Adrian Paschke
• the NEW BLD document Michael Kifer
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Michael Kifer
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Chris Welty
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Chris Welty
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Chris Welty

Monday, 4 February 2008

• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Michael Kifer
• Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 5 Jos de Bruijn
• Re: Minutes from January 29, 2008, telecon Christian de Sainte Marie
• [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon February 5 Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Christian de Sainte Marie

Sunday, 3 February 2008

• Re: ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins Axel Polleres
• Re: ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins Jos de Bruijn
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Jos de Bruijn

Friday, 1 February 2008

• ACTION-408: separating the different issues in the question about fct vs predicate forms for builtins Axel Polleres
• Re: lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Michael Kifer
• Re: F2F9 Registration Form Christian de Sainte Marie
• F2F9 Registration Form Sandro Hawke
• Re: Annotations and metadata in RIF Jos de Bruijn
• lack of model theory for errors in built-ins Jos de Bruijn

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 21:44:11 UTC