- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:49:35 -0500
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu (Michael Kifer)
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
> it looks good, but I did not understand which color-coded diffs you are > talking about. If you look to the right of the "Previous Version" URL, near the top of http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080215/ and you should see a link called "color-coded diff". > Apart from the little problems that you mentioned, I noticed that the new > wiki contains all the MoinMoin files (including references, appendix) in > one wiki file. Is it how it is supposed to be in Mediawiki? Yes. MediaWiki has no problem with big files or concurrent editing, and it has "[edit]" links by each heading to allow editing of just that section. By the way, there are lots of options other than It's All Text! for mediawiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_editor_support I currently have Preferences/Editing/UseExternalEditorByDefault set, with some script which runs emacs, though I can't figure out right now how I set it up. (But it does allow me to stay in emacs while I save versions.) -- Sandro > > I believe I have completed the script [1] to convert TR-style documents > > from MoinMoin to MediaWiki. > > > > For example: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080214/ > > was generated by wiki-tr from the MoinMoin page: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/BLD > > > > ... and > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080215/ > > was generated by wikisnapper [2] from the MediaWiki page: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Conversion-test > > > > If you look at the "color coded diff" on the second (0215) page, you'll > > see a few differences: > > > > * A comma after the editor's names. We may want to manually remove > > the parens and make the editor's names links. > > * Some "Please Comment By" boilerplate text > > * The section numbering does not skip levels. Instead of > > having "2.0.1" (and no "2.1." anything) we now have "2.1". I > > expect this is a bug-fix. > > * The Table-of-Contents format is slightly different, eg without > > trailing periods on numbers. > > * There are a few changes in non-breaking whitespace, none of > > which I think is a problem (but it shows up on the diff) > > * The URLs in the Reference are not all turned into links any > > more; I believe the new behavior is correct. > > > > (For this diff I cheated and manually expanded " and > in the > > new version before running the diff, since mediawiki outputs them.) > > > > This turned out to be quite hairy! See [1] if you're curious. > > > > Editors -- please look that Conversion-test page and see if it looks > > okay and if you're ready for us to move to MediaWiki. My script for > > publishing from MediaWiki (wikisnapper [2]) automates a lot more of > > publishing than wiki-tr did, so I want to use it for the next round. My > > inclination is to switch before the F2F, so we can more easily iron out > > any difficulties in the conversion, but I don't want to complicated > > things for the editors, either. > > > > I had talked at one point about being able to use HTML as the MediaWiki > > source format. That turned out not to work right (the wiki doesn't see > > section headings inside an html-block), so we have what we have, which > > is wiki markup plus bits of safe-HTML as needed. > > > > MediaWiki formatting: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cheatsheet > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_edit_a_page > > > > Comments? > > > > -- Sandro > > > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2007/groupdev/tr-to-mediawiki.sh > > [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2007/groupdev/wikisnapper.py > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 19:49:54 UTC