- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:25:44 +0000
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Christian de Sainte Marie wrote: > > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C Rules Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group > 19 February 2008 > > North America in the winter time: > 1600 UTC, 0800 (West US) 1100 (East US) 1600 (London) 1700 (Paris) > > Duration: *90 min* > > *Agenda summary* > 1. Admin (5 mn) > PROPOSED: accept minutes of telecon February 12 [1] > 2. Action review [2] (5 min) > 3. Liaison (5 mn) > 4. [BLD] Issue 44 (named arguments Uniterm) [3] (10 mn) > PROPOSED: to close issue 44 with no change to BLD (that is, keeping > named arguments Uniterm in BLD). [I'll miss the call.] My vote remains -0. AFAIK the number of identified systems which actually support named uniterms that would benefit from this feature remains rather small, the cost to everyone else of having to simulate them is not completely trivial. HP does not formally object to this feature but it does seem like one more straw. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 09:26:18 UTC