Re: a "modest proposal" for PRD

Gary Hallmark wrote:
> 
> Start with exactly the BLD syntax.  Add just 1 or 2 "hard" things (e.g. 
> retraction and rule priority) that are common in PR and make a model 
> theory very difficult.  Do not respecify the syntax, just add the new 
> elements.  Develop an Operational Semantics for it, as defined by 
> Plotkin in http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/gdp/publications/sos_jlap.pdf.  
> Do not spend time on informal semantics that can only diverge from the 
> formal semantics.  Only after PRD has caught up with BLD in terms of 
> semantic rigor should it incorporate negation, aggregation, other 
> actions, etc.
> 
> The task of developing a formal Operational Semantics for PRD is not 
> trivial and would be best attempted by someone who has done something 
> similar before.

Well said ... I fully agree.

-hak
-- 
Hassan Aït-Kaci  *  ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D
http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2008 09:56:10 UTC