public-rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2013 by date

Sunday, 30 June 2013

• Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Manu Sporny
• Re: editorial change Pat Hayes

Friday, 28 June 2013

• Re: ACTION-274 is not done David Wood
• Re: N-Quads test suite (ACTION-275) Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 27 June 2013

• Re: editorial change Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: changes to TurtleTests since inception Eric Prud'hommeaux
• N-Quads test suite (ACTION-275) Gregg Kellogg
• editorial change Pat Hayes
• Re: changes to RDF Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts Sandro Hawke
• Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts David Wood
• Re: Future Test Suite release process Guus Schreiber
• Re: changes to RDF Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: changes to TurtleTests since inception Gregg Kellogg

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

• Re: changes to RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Regrets for 26 June Telecon Antoine Zimmermann
• changes to RDF Semantics Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Future Test Suite release process Gregg Kellogg
• Future Test Suite release process Gavin Carothers
• Minutes of the telecon of 2013-06-26 Markus Lanthaler
• changes to TurtleTests since inception Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ACTION-274 is not done Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon Guus Schreiber
• Regrets for 26 June Telecon David Wood
• chairs meeting? Guus Schreiber
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? Sandro Hawke
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon Andy Seaborne
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? Pat Hayes
• Re: union of graphs [soolved with a minor issue] Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-25 Manu Sporny
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? David Wood
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: agenda 26 June telecon Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? Antoine Zimmermann
• union of graphs [soolved with a minor issue] Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: agenda for Wednesday 26 June? Guus Schreiber
• agenda 26 June telecon Guus Schreiber
• agenda for Wednesday 26 June? Peter Patel-Schneider
• D-entailment [solved] Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 25th 2013 Peter Patel-Schneider

Monday, 24 June 2013

• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 25th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Manu Sporny

Sunday, 23 June 2013

• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 22 June 2013

• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Andy Seaborne
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Sandro Hawke
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Andy Seaborne
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Sandro Hawke
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt Pat Hayes

Friday, 21 June 2013

• Re: Promoting rdf-mt Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt Pat Hayes
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: Promoting rdf-mt Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Promoting rdf-mt Sandro Hawke
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments / review of Concepts Gavin Carothers
• Re: comments / review of Concepts Pat Hayes
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Pat Hayes
• Re: comments / review of Concepts Peter Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 20 June 2013

• RE: comments / review of Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• RE: datasets mean their default graphs? Markus Lanthaler
• RE: datasets mean their default graphs? Markus Lanthaler
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: comments / review of Concepts Pat Hayes
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Andy Seaborne
• RE: datasets mean their default graphs? Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Managing Public Comments to the RDF WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments / review of Concepts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: datasets mean their default graphs? Andy Seaborne
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Pat Hayes
• datasets mean their default graphs? Pat Hayes
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

• TriG is about semicolons and dots, delimited by occasional RDF data. Ivan Mikhailov
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Managing Public Comments to the RDF WG David Wood
• Re: entailments from sets of graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: /2013/TurtleTests/ Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition Pat Hayes
• Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Pat Hayes
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition Pat Hayes
• Re: datatypes Antoine Zimmermann
• Minutes of the telecon of 2013-06-19 Andy Seaborne
• entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics) Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments / review of Concepts David Wood
• Re: /2013/TurtleTests/ Andy Seaborne
• entailments from sets of graphs Peter Patel-Schneider
• Managing Public Comments to the RDF WG David Wood
• Re: /2013/TurtleTests/ Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Gregg Kellogg
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-18 Manu Sporny
• Re: datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition Antoine Zimmermann
• agenda 19 Jun telecon; proposed duration: 90 minutes Guus Schreiber
• a proposal for this week - bridging the gap between JSON-LD and RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Manu Sporny

Monday, 17 June 2013

• Re: comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Kingsley Idehen
• comments on JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: relationship between JSON-LD and RDF Kingsley Idehen
• RE: relationship between JSON-LD and RDF Markus Lanthaler
• semantics new edit Pat Hayes
• Re: editing woes Pat Hayes
• editing woes Pat Hayes
• Re: relationship between JSON-LD and RDF Pat Hayes
• relationship between JSON-LD and RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 18th 2013 Manu Sporny

Sunday, 16 June 2013

• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-11 Andy Seaborne
• Re: datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) Pat Hayes

Saturday, 15 June 2013

• Re: TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. Gregg Kellogg
• Re: TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. Gavin Carothers
• Re: TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. Gregg Kellogg
• TriG -- trailing DOT in {} blocks. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) Pat Hayes
• Re: datatypes without datatype maps Pat Hayes
• Re: union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) with an addition Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• union (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• datatypes (Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013)) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• /2013/TurtleTests/ Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) Pat Hayes

Friday, 14 June 2013

• Re: TriG test suite Gregg Kellogg
• Re: TriG test suite Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [RDF-CONCEPTS] Skolemization Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) Pat Hayes
• TriG test suite Gregg Kellogg

Thursday, 13 June 2013

• Re: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! Manu Sporny
• Re: JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF David Wood
• Re: JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF David Wood
• JSON-LD and its relationship to RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

• datatypes without datatype maps Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for 12 June 2013 Antoine Zimmermann
• Review RDF 1.1 Semantics (ED 3rd June 2013) Antoine Zimmermann

Tuesday, 11 June 2013

• RE: RDF-ISSUE-136 (indicating-dataset-semantics): How can one indicate which semantics are intended for a Dataset? [RDF Concepts] Markus Lanthaler
• RDF-ISSUE-136 (indicating-dataset-semantics): How can one indicate which semantics are intended for a Dataset? [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-11 Manu Sporny
• Intent to close ISSUE-253 / was: Treat reverse term definitions more like regular definitions (ISSUE-253) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Agenda for 12 June 2013 David Wood
• Re: rdf semantics first? PWD Sandro Hawke
• rdf semantics first? PWD Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 10 June 2013

• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 11th 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Agenda for 12 June 2013 Sandro Hawke
• Re: minor changes to Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for 12 June 2013 David Wood
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 11th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: minor changes to Semantics Pat Hayes

Sunday, 9 June 2013

• Re: minor changes to Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: minor changes to Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: minor changes to Semantics Ivan Herman
• minor changes to Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Treat reverse term definitions more like regular definitions (ISSUE-253) Markus Lanthaler

Saturday, 8 June 2013

• RE: minimal dataset semantics Markus Lanthaler

Friday, 7 June 2013

• minimal dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 6 June 2013

• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-06-04 Manu Sporny
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Sandro Hawke
• RE: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Andy Seaborne
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Pat Hayes
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Andy Seaborne
• Re: graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Sandro Hawke
• graph names denoting the graph (suggested change to Concepts) Peter Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-112 is moot, according to Mark Baker Peter Patel-Schneider
• Minutes of the telecon of 2013-June-05 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Status N-Triples / N-Quads Gavin Carothers
• Status N-Triples / N-Quads Guus Schreiber
• Re: Examples in TriG spec don't display Gavin Carothers
• Examples in TriG spec don't display Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Dan Brickley
• agenda 5 June telecon Guus Schreiber
• Regrets for today Souripriya Das
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Kingsley Idehen
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Property Graphs as (bound) RDF Datasets Kingsley Idehen
• Regrets for today's telecon Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets William Waites
• Re: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature Andy Seaborne
• Re: Property Graphs as (bound) RDF Datasets Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Property Graphs as (bound) RDF Datasets Sandro Hawke
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Sandro Hawke
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Dan Brickley
• RE: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Kingsley Idehen

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

• Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD Ivan Herman
• schema.org post about JSON-LD Dan Brickley
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets Sandro Hawke
• RE: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature Markus Lanthaler
• Re: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature Sandro Hawke
• dataset stuff as an extension or optional feature Sandro Hawke

Monday, 3 June 2013

• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets Sandro Hawke
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets Sandro Hawke
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: Bound and Unbound Datasets Gregg Kellogg
• Bound and Unbound Datasets Sandro Hawke
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Markus Lanthaler
• RE: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Dan Brickley

Sunday, 2 June 2013

• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 4th 2013 Markus Lanthaler
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, June 4th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Pat Hayes
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Pat Hayes

Saturday, 1 June 2013

• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Sandro Hawke
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Andy Seaborne
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Pat Hayes
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Sandro Hawke
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Markus Lanthaler
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers (ISSUE-131) Pat Hayes
• Re: bNodes as graph identifiers Pat Hayes
• RE: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Sandro Hawke
• Re: Resolutions for features at risk [JSON-LD] Gregg Kellogg

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2013 18:18:29 UTC