- From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:32:10 -0700
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Here are the changes that I think are required for SEMANTICS and CONCEPTS. SEMANTICS Informative Sections 5.1.1, 5.2, 5.4, 6, 7.2.1, 8.1.1, 9.1, 9.2.1, A, B, C, D, E CHANGES 5.1.1, 6, 7.2.1, 8.1.1, 9.1, 9.2.1 Normative Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 Remove ISSUE 1 in Section 10, with no change required Changes to allow for blank nodes as graph names - already done - see Section 10 Changes to allow for blank nodes as properties [This section intentionally blank.] CONCEPTS Informative Sections 1, 4.2, 6, 7 OK Normative Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 OK Changes to allow for blank nodes as graph names - already done - see Section 4 Changes to allow for blank nodes as properties - Section 3.1 - the predicate, which is an IRI or a blank node - It is possible for a predicate to also occur as a node in the same graph Warnings - Section 3.1 new note after the existing note Note: Blank node predicates are new in RDF 1.1. Existing implementations of RDF might not accept this new feature for some time, so the use of blank nodes as predicates can cause interoperability problems. - Section 4 new note before the existing note Note: Blank nodes as graph names are new in RDF 1.1. Existing implementations of SPARQL might not accept this new feature for some time, so the use of blank nodes as graph names can cause interoperability problems. On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote: > All, > > The draft agenda is at: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.06.26#TriG > > Guus >
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 16:32:37 UTC