- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:30:17 -0400
- To: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 13:30:40 UTC
Hi all, I have reviewed the minutes of yesterday's telecon and see that there was a straw poll (but no resolution) to add a non-normative set of definitions [1] relating to extended RDF graphs and datasets to Concepts for use in Semantics. These definitions are, I think, intended to grant permission to RDF compliant serialization formats like JSON-LD to allow the looser restrictions. Is that correct? I acknowledge that I need to make the changes to Concepts. This takes care of Guus' ACTION-276 [2]. However, I admit to being confused about this line in the minutes [3] :) [[ Peter Patel-Schneider: that's 'generalized' could be 'generalized', not generalized could be generalized (further) ]] Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Jun/0204.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/276 [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-06-26#line0215
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 13:30:40 UTC