Re: Adding Extended RDF Graphs and Datasets to Concepts

I believe that this was intended to be a part of Concepts that has no effect 
on RDF, and thus can be considered to be editorial.

peter

On 06/27/2013 06:30 AM, David Wood wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have reviewed the minutes of yesterday's telecon and see that there was a straw poll (but no resolution) to add a non-normative set of definitions [1] relating to extended RDF graphs and datasets to Concepts for use in Semantics.
>
> These definitions are, I think, intended to grant permission to RDF compliant serialization formats like JSON-LD to allow the looser restrictions.  Is that correct?
>
> I acknowledge that I need to make the changes to Concepts.  This takes care of Guus' ACTION-276 [2].
>
> However, I admit to being confused about this line in the minutes [3] :)
> [[
> Peter Patel-Schneider: that's 'generalized' could be 'generalized', not generalized could be generalized (further)
> ]]
>
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Jun/0204.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/276
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-06-26#line0215
>

Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 14:25:50 UTC