- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:25:20 -0700
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I believe that this was intended to be a part of Concepts that has no effect on RDF, and thus can be considered to be editorial. peter On 06/27/2013 06:30 AM, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > I have reviewed the minutes of yesterday's telecon and see that there was a straw poll (but no resolution) to add a non-normative set of definitions [1] relating to extended RDF graphs and datasets to Concepts for use in Semantics. > > These definitions are, I think, intended to grant permission to RDF compliant serialization formats like JSON-LD to allow the looser restrictions. Is that correct? > > I acknowledge that I need to make the changes to Concepts. This takes care of Guus' ACTION-276 [2]. > > However, I admit to being confused about this line in the minutes [3] :) > [[ > Peter Patel-Schneider: that's 'generalized' could be 'generalized', not generalized could be generalized (further) > ]] > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Jun/0204.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/276 > [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-06-26#line0215 >
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 14:25:50 UTC