entailments from sets of graphs

• From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:50:11 -0700
• To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAMpDgVz_4L4OvEk0N_bxrV9MuHgBTuuFkmn6gTYpgVg0OP8HhQ@mail.gmail.com>

Antoine brought forward what the change in entailment is between 2004
and 2013.  I did not catch that this was his concern.

The change is that if you have a set of RDF graphs then they entail
what their union entails, instead of what their merge entails.

This is a change.  The question is whether this is a good change or a
bad change.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 15:50:42 UTC