- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:40:44 -0500
- To: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Peter, I just noticed that the simple interpretation mappings state: 4. a mapping IS from IRIs into (IR union IP) and that the ..union IP.. is redundant, since (as noted later in the text) IP may overlap with IR. SInce on the next line, IL is defined as a mapping into IR without mentioning IP, this is also misleading. I think this should read 4. a mapping IS from IRIs into IR. Do you agree? Pat PS what sent me checking this was the possibility in the generalized syntax of having a literal in property position. You can probably retrace my steps at this point. ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 15:41:14 UTC