Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics)

I'll make a pass over the document to find the edits (maybe by actually making 
them and producing a diff) and send that around for approval.

peter

On 06/19/2013 09:09 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
>
>> At first sight, I find this solution to be a good compromise.
> Then I wholeheartedly agree. This will enable us to make progress.
>
> Good job, Peter :-)
>
> Do you want me to do the necessary edits?
>
> Pat
>
>> Since I know the content of the documents pretty well, I am pretty sure that it does not require substantial changes.
>>
>> Thank you to have taken my concerns in consideration.
>>
>>
>> AZ
>>
>> Le 19/06/2013 18:26, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit :
>>> One way to move forward on the union vs merge front is to not define
>>> entailment for sets of RDF graphs.   If one has a set of RDF graphs,
>>> then one has to first either union or merge them.
>>>
>>> There would need to be changes in several places in RDF Semantics.  I
>>> don't think that these changes would be substantive (but they might be
>>> substantial).  No changes should be needed in any other document,
>>> which shows just how much importance this issue has.   (Yes, I've
>>> checked RDF Concepts, which is the only place where there might have
>>> been required changes.)
>>>
>>> I'm willing to go through and document the changes required, and
>>> determine whether there is any substantive change required, *provided
>>> that the interested parties agree that this change is an acceptable
>>> solution to the issue*.
>>>
>>>
>>> I hereby state that I agree that removing entailment for sets of RDF
>>> graphs is an acceptable solution to the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>>> Nuance Communications
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Antoine Zimmermann
>> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
>> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
>> 158 cours Fauriel
>> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
>> France
>> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
>> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
>> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 05:30:32 UTC