Re: schema.org post about JSON-LD

On 6/4/13 11:59 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 4 June 2013 17:45, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>> On 6/4/13 6:17 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>>> FYI...  at schema.org we've posted a short note, basically to say that
>>> we like JSON-LD and expect it will prove very useful with schema.org
>>> structured data. Oh, and thanks for all your work on it!
>>>
>>> See http://blog.schema.org/2013/06/schemaorg-and-json-ld.html
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>> Dan,
>>
>> As per my comment on your post, what about support Fro Turtle too? It's
>> embeddable using <script/>, just like JSON-LD.
>>
>> Goal: to offer people a broad range of choices, in line with "horses for
>> courses" essence of the Web.
> I can only speak for my own (somewhat constrained) time but personally
> I would rather put some renewed effort into improving the picture
> around RDFa w.r.t. schema.org (and w.r.t. Google), before jumping into
> yet another format.  This is nothing against Turtle, and I'm sure it
> has its place!
>
> Dan
>
>
Dan,

All that's required here is acknowledging that using <script/> for 
embedding JSON-LD also applies to Turtle. That's it. A note is all 
that's required. I am not looking to Google to write a Turtle parser or 
anything like that i.e., not requiring embedded Turtle to affect their 
rich snippets effort which is where the parsing requirement comes into 
pla).

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen