Re: rdf semantics first? PWD

On 06/11/2013 12:07 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I believe that Semantics has already had a FPWD.
>

Yes, my mistake.   Sorry about that.

      -- Sandro

> peter
>
> On 06/10/2013 07:33 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> [if you're going to go into details on any of these, please change 
>> the subject]
>>
>> On 06/09/2013 09:25 PM, David Wood wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The agenda for Wed's telecon is available at:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.06.12
>>>
>>> Please note that we expect to add a resolution suggestion to 
>>> ISSUE-23 and a poll for ISSUE-131 in the next two days, so they may 
>>> be added to the agenda.  I'll send a note to the list if the agenda 
>>> gets updated and will ensure we have 24 hours notice.  Apologies for 
>>> any inconvenience.
>>>
>>
>> I was expecting to see:
>>
>>     PROPOSED: Publish rdf-concepts as a Last Call Working Draft (after
>>     incorporating any changes agreed on during this meeting)
>>
>>     PROPOSED: Publish rdf-mt as a First Public and Last Call Working 
>> Draft
>>     (after incorporating any changes agreed on during this meeting)
>>
>> I'd like to know ASAP so I know whether to (somehow) find time to 
>> read them before then.
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 05:05:03 UTC