Re: entailment on sets of RDF graphs (union vs merge semantics)

On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:

> At first sight, I find this solution to be a good compromise.

Then I wholeheartedly agree. This will enable us to make progress. 

Good job, Peter :-)

Do you want me to do the necessary edits? 

Pat

> 
> Since I know the content of the documents pretty well, I am pretty sure that it does not require substantial changes.
> 
> Thank you to have taken my concerns in consideration.
> 
> 
> AZ
> 
> Le 19/06/2013 18:26, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit :
>> One way to move forward on the union vs merge front is to not define
>> entailment for sets of RDF graphs.   If one has a set of RDF graphs,
>> then one has to first either union or merge them.
>> 
>> There would need to be changes in several places in RDF Semantics.  I
>> don't think that these changes would be substantive (but they might be
>> substantial).  No changes should be needed in any other document,
>> which shows just how much importance this issue has.   (Yes, I've
>> checked RDF Concepts, which is the only place where there might have
>> been required changes.)
>> 
>> I'm willing to go through and document the changes required, and
>> determine whether there is any substantive change required, *provided
>> that the interested parties agree that this change is an acceptable
>> solution to the issue*.
>> 
>> 
>> I hereby state that I agree that removing entailment for sets of RDF
>> graphs is an acceptable solution to the issue.
>> 
>> 
>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>> Nuance Communications
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Antoine Zimmermann
> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
> 158 cours Fauriel
> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
> France
> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 04:10:00 UTC