- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:59:00 -0700
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 4 June 2013 17:45, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 6/4/13 6:17 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> FYI... at schema.org we've posted a short note, basically to say that >> we like JSON-LD and expect it will prove very useful with schema.org >> structured data. Oh, and thanks for all your work on it! >> >> See http://blog.schema.org/2013/06/schemaorg-and-json-ld.html >> >> Dan >> >> > Dan, > > As per my comment on your post, what about support Fro Turtle too? It's > embeddable using <script/>, just like JSON-LD. > > Goal: to offer people a broad range of choices, in line with "horses for > courses" essence of the Web. I can only speak for my own (somewhat constrained) time but personally I would rather put some renewed effort into improving the picture around RDFa w.r.t. schema.org (and w.r.t. Google), before jumping into yet another format. This is nothing against Turtle, and I'm sure it has its place! Dan
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 03:59:28 UTC