- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:20:53 +0200
- To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:12 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > What do you think about putting some of the material currently in > Semantics section 4.1 into Concepts section 6? I have no axe to grind > on this, but maybe we should at least consider the idea. It is not > directly concerned with semantics so much as the machinery of combining > graphs into larger ones, which seems like fairly basic stuff that all > RDF users should know about. Nice pictures! They are very helpful IMO Concepts should be as simple (and short) as possible. So actually I would like to see some stuff to be moved from Concepts to Semantics :-) For example the sections about isomorphism or section 1.7 Equivalence, Entailment and Inconsistency. All of them are self-contained and more or less duplicate what's already in Semantics. Just my two cents... -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 21:21:28 UTC