public-qt-comments@w3.org from June 2004 by date

Wednesday, 30 June 2004

• FW: [XSLT 2.0] format-dateTime localised picture parameters long medium short Michael Kay

Monday, 28 June 2004

• Re: [F&O] XSCH-FO-007 Casting numerics and inconsistency Xan Gregg
• Re: [F&O] XSCH-FO-005 Casting xs:double and xs:float to xs:string Xan Gregg

Friday, 25 June 2004

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model Sandy Gao
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Thursday, 24 June 2004

• Re: multiple modules with same namespace Per Bothner
• Re: [XSLT2.0] PSVI, XPath, and optimization Niko Matsakis
• Re: [XSLT2.0] value-of and backwards compatibility Michael Kay
• RE: [XSLT2.0] PSVI, XPath, and optimization Michael Kay
• Re: [XSLT2.0] PSVI, XPath, and optimization Mary Holstege
• Re: multiple modules with same namespace Mary Holstege
• RE: lazy or eager variable initialization? [qt-2004Feb1090-01] Michael Kay
• RE: [XSLT2.0] format-number function / xsl:decimal-format Michael Kay

Wednesday, 23 June 2004

• FW: [XSLT 2.0] request, unparsed-entity-references Michael Kay
• Re: lazy or eager variable initialization? [qt-2004Feb1090-01] Per Bothner
• RE: lazy or eager variable initialization? [qt-2004Feb1090-01] Michael Kay
• re: [XSLT 2.0] format-dateTime localised picture parameters long medium short Michael Kay
• Re: [XSLT2.0] Binding of a local xsl:variable or xsl:param by another local xsl:variable/xsl:param Michael Kay
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] request, unparsed-entity-references Michael Kay

Tuesday, 22 June 2004

• Re: lazy or eager variable initialization? [qt-2004Feb1090-01] Per Bothner
• Re: lazy or eager variable initialization? [qt-2004Feb1090-01] Liam Quin
• Veterans Right to Attorney Representation Petition and Merchant Marine Bill/Write Your Representatives Walter Kozlowski

Wednesday, 16 June 2004

• [XSLT2.0] format-number function / xsl:decimal-format Dan Culley

Tuesday, 15 June 2004

• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• [FS] for clause normalization Per Bothner
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments François Yergeau
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments François Yergeau
• [FS] Editorial comments on Section 4 and a General Editorial remark Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-110 Michael Rys
• [FS] Editorial Comments on Appendix B.2 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-106 Michael Rys

Monday, 14 June 2004

• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-113 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-068 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-087 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-118 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-116 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-088 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-114 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-119 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-120: Skipped Sections in 4 due to reworking of validation and construction Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-121 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-122 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-126 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-130 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-134 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-133 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-127 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-129 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-123 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-125 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-132 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-060 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-062 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-065 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-064 Michael Rys
• [FS] MS-FS-LC1-057 Michael Rys
• RE: [XPath 2.0] Sequences can never be nested ... but what about function arguments? Roger L. Costello
• Re: [XPath 2.0] Sequences can never be nested ... but what about function arguments? Jim Melton
• [XPath 2.0] Sequences can never be nested ... but what about function arguments? Roger L. Costello
• RE: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-010 Michael Rys

Sunday, 13 June 2004

• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-P Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-Q Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-327-B: Surely namespace declaration is part of serializing XML version 1.0 Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-310-E: difficult sentence to parse Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-303-B: undeclare-namespaces parameter is relevant to markup generation Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-293-E: Redundant phrase that can be deleted Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-328-E: no mention of the standalone property Henry Zongaro
• Fw: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-003 Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-299-E: misplaced comma Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-297-E: Alphabetization problem Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-295-E: The Note overflow the right margin when printed Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-290-E: Title misuses the term "data models" Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-003 Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-004 Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-010 Henry Zongaro

Thursday, 10 June 2004

• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Jim Melton
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• Re: [FO] error in fn:substring-before Jim Melton
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• RE: [FO] error in fn:substring-before Michael Kay
• [FO] error in fn:substring-before Douglas Petkanics
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Kay
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Kay
• Re: PLease define 'collation' Michael Brundage
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Rys
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Jim Melton

Wednesday, 9 June 2004

• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Kay
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Rys
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• Re: computed namespace constructors [qt-2003Nov0292-01] Liam Quin
• RE: CDATA Michael Rys
• CDATA Diana Castillo
• RE: Casting/constructors should accept the empty sequence Michael Kay
• RE: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro

Tuesday, 8 June 2004

• RE: Casting/constructors should accept the empty sequence Jim Melton
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Kay
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Igor Hersht
• [public-qt-comments] <none> Igor Hersht

Monday, 7 June 2004

• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serial] IBM-SE-103: Treatment of whitespace in XHTML attributes Henry Zongaro
• Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-004: XML Output Method Henry Zongaro
• Re: ORA-SE-309-B: Poorly worded constraints on the output Henry Zongaro
• Re: [XPath] About fn:last() Fang Yidong

Sunday, 6 June 2004

• Re: [XPath] About fn:last() Michael Brundage

Friday, 4 June 2004

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model Norman Walsh
• Re: [DM] Infoset mapping and dm:node-name Norman Walsh
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Data Model Norman Walsh
• Re: [XSLT 2.0] Data types for a Basic XSLT processor Colin Paul Adams

Thursday, 3 June 2004

• re: [XSLT 2.0] Data types for a Basic XSLT processor Michael Kay
• RE: Typos in the November XSLT 2.0 Specification Michael Kay
• re: [XSLT 2.0] Setting off Deprecated Attributes Michael Kay
• Re [XSLT 2.0] Parameterized result-document Michael Kay
• Typos in the November XSLT 2.0 Specification Roger L. Costello
• RE: PLease define 'collation' Michael Kay
• RE: [XPath] About fn:last() Michael Kay
• [XPath] About fn:last() Fang Yidong

Wednesday, 2 June 2004

• Re: PLease define 'collation' David Carlisle
• PLease define 'collation' Ashok Malhotra

Tuesday, 1 June 2004

• Fw: Re: Cast/constructor should allow empty sequence. Ashok Malhotra
• Re: [F&O] 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal David Carlisle
• RE: [F&O] 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal Michael Rys
• anyURI and string Ashok Malhotra
• Re: [F&O] 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal Ashok Malhotra
• Re: [F&O] 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal David Carlisle
• RE: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Martin Duerst
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Martin Duerst
• Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments Martin Duerst
• RE: Casting/constructors should accept the empty sequence Michael Rys
• [XPath], [XQuery] i18n comments Martin Duerst

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 06:26:15 UTC