- From: Mary Holstege <mary.holstege@marklogic.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:53:03 -0700
- To: niko@datapower.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Dear Niko, This is a response to the following message, which you posted to the XML Query Working Group's comments list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Nov/0053.html The XML Query Working Group considered your comment and decided to make no change. First note that the data model defines mappings both from the PSVI and from the vanilla Infoset, and given that the PSVI is an extension of the Infoset, an implementation is perfectly free to provide only the Infoset mapping. An implementation of XSLT is further free to provide provide facilities for handling documents as if there were no schema information available. So the part of your comments regarding allowing PSVI annotation to be disregarded is already an option available to implementors. With respect to dynamic versus static dispatch of operators such as "+", you don't need to bring date-time types into play to run into the issue. Since there is more than one numeric type, dynamic dispatch will still be necessary, given that integer addition and floating point addition are not the same. Type polymorphism requires late binding even for numeric types. The WG is not prepared to abandon polymorphism for arithmetic operators for different numeric types, nor to abandon those different numeric types. We appreciate your feedback on the XML Query specifications. Please let us know if this response is satisfactory. If not, please respond to this message, explaining your concerns. Mary Holstege On behalf of the XML Query Working Group
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 08:53:34 UTC