public-owl-wg@w3.org from January 2009 by author

Achille Fokoue

• Re: complete minutes of 14 Jan (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Agenda for teleconference 2009.01.07 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: Column Affected documents (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: LC: FH6 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: LC: FH6 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment (Thursday, 15 January)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: ACTION-277 complete (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere (Friday, 30 January)
• Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Column Affected documents (Friday, 30 January)
• ACTION-277 complete (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-268 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• First LC response sent (Thursday, 29 January)
• ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Thursday, 29 January)
• ACTION-276 completed (Thursday, 29 January)
• Conformance text for Unicode etc. (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Normative vs. Informative references (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RDF Bug report sent (tracking with ACTION-267) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 28 January)
• SHORT VERSION (Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Wednesday, 28 January)
• GRDDL Security Considerations ( was Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• More OWL EL implementations (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Stuff on swig list (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: LC: FH6 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Tuesday, 27 January)
• LC: FH6 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Can an object property be both functional and transitive? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: OWL 2 Slide Presentation (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Can an object property be both functional and transitive? (Monday, 26 January)
• LC: SS1 (Monday, 26 January)
• LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: LC Comment: Names for axioms (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: XML Schema for OWL/XML (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: XML Schema for OWL/XML (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Friday, 23 January)
• XML Schema for OWL/XML (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Friday, 23 January)
• LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Friday, 23 January)
• LC Comment: Names for axioms (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) (Friday, 23 January)
• Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE (Friday, 23 January)
• "A" vs. "the" (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: ACTION-268 (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: ACTION-268 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: ACTION-265 DONE (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: ACTION-268 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• ACTION-267 DONE (Wednesday, 21 January)
• ACTION-265 DONE (Wednesday, 21 January)
• ACTION-268 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Better support for "looking at" test cases (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Requirements document? (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Requirements document? (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Monday, 19 January)
• Primer et al (Wednesday, 7 January)

Boris Motik

• RE: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Thursday, 22 January)
• A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document (Thursday, 15 January)
• An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment (Wednesday, 14 January)

Carsten Lutz

• Re: Requirements document? (Tuesday, 20 January)

Christine Golbreich

• Re: ACTION-277 complete (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Column Affected documents (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Action-269 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: OWL 2 Slide Presentation (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ACTION-268 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: ACTION-268 (Wednesday, 21 January)

Evan Wallace

• Action-269 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Draft minutes from 17 December OWL WG telecon (Tuesday, 6 January)

Héctor Pérez-Urbina

• Agenda TC 28/01/2009 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Agenda TC 21/01/2009 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Agenda TC 14/01/2009 (Tuesday, 13 January)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: Column Affected documents (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: First LC response sent (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: tiny editorial comment (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: OWL 2 Slide Presentation (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Internal WG comments during LC period (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics (Monday, 19 January)
• Posting internal comments to public-owl-comments list (Friday, 9 January)
• Fwd: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml" (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: WebOnt DL Test Cases ready (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Agenda for teleconference 2009.01.07 (Tuesday, 6 January)

Ivan Herman

• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-274: first draft (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-267 DONE (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• FYI: [CURIE Syntax 1.0 is a Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)] (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Trouble with IRC (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Trouble with IRC (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Additional examples to the syntax? (Friday, 9 January)
• tiny editorial comment (Thursday, 8 January)

Jie Bao

• Re: Can an object property be both functional and transitive? (Monday, 26 January)
• Can an object property be both functional and transitive? (Monday, 26 January)
• Minutes of 2009-02-21 (Sunday, 25 January)
• Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text (Wednesday, 14 January)

Jim Hendler

• Re: Proposal for multiple syntaxes everywhere (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)
• profiles and the rec track (Tuesday, 27 January)

Jonathan Rees

• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Tuesday, 27 January)

Luciano, Joanne S.

• RE: Trouble with IRC (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Trouble with IRC (Wednesday, 14 January)

Markus Krötzsch

• Better support for "looking at" test cases (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: WebOnt DL Test Cases ready (Wednesday, 7 January)

Martin Dzbor

• Minutes from 28 Jan (Thursday, 29 January)

Michael Schneider

• RE: Column Affected documents (Friday, 30 January)
• RE: LC: Opposing OWL/XML format (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• FW: TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: LC Comment: Names for axioms (Sunday, 25 January)
• RE: Proposed comment for RDF (Re: ACTION-267 DONE) (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: OWL 2 LC Comments (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: ACTION-265 DONE (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: ACTION-265 DONE (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RE: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: [CURIE Syntax 1.0 is a Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)] (Saturday, 17 January)
• RE: An explanation of the technical difficulties surrounding Alan Rector's comment (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document (Friday, 16 January)
• missing(?) RFC2119 statement in Direct Semantics (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) (Wednesday, 7 January)
• RE: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 7 January)
• RE: Discussion of WebOnt test I4.6-005 (Wednesday, 7 January)
• F2F5: ESTA travel authorization (Thursday, 1 January)

Mike Smith

• Re: Ontology header is a requirement - inconsistent with resolution of ISSUE-135? (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Ontology header is a requirement - inconsistent with resolution of ISSUE-135? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document (Friday, 16 January)
• The definition of entailment in the Direct Semantics document (Thursday, 15 January)
• WebOnt's RDF structure sharing test cases (Thursday, 8 January)
• List of tests that were approved at 2009-01-07 telecon (Thursday, 8 January)
• WebOnt Issue Test Cases ready (Tuesday, 6 January)
• WebOnt DL Test Cases ready (Monday, 5 January)
• Discussion of WebOnt test I4.6-005 (Monday, 5 January)

Pathak, Jyotishman, Ph.D.

• RE: OWL 2 Slide Presentation (Tuesday, 27 January)
• OWL 2 Slide Presentation (Monday, 26 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Minutes from 28 Jan (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Agenda TC 21/01/2009 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) (Wednesday, 7 January)
• ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Wednesday, 7 January)
• XML Schema datatype for OWL version of date/time (ACTION-252) (Wednesday, 7 January)

Sandro Hawke

• disjointness of numerics (Wednesday, 21 January)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: Response to Andy Seaborne's comments on rdf:text (Monday, 19 January)

Solbrig, Harold R.

• RE: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Friday, 23 January)

Vojtech Svatek

• RE: LC Comment: "Hidden" Axioms (Saturday, 24 January)

Zhe Wu

• Re: A slight issue with datatypes in OWL 2 RL (Friday, 23 January)
• OWL 2 LC Comments (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: A minor bug in OWL 2 RL - Theorem PR1 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Print out of Functional-style syntax has tiny fonts. (Thursday, 15 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 09:50:43 UTC