- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:36:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: schneid@fzi.de
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> Subject: RE: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:30:17 +0100 > >-----Original Message----- > >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] > >On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel-Schneider > >Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 8:34 PM > >To: public-owl-wg@w3.org > >Subject: ACTION-261 (change owl:dateTime to xsd:dateTimeStamp) > > > > > >I've changed syntax to use xsd:dateTimeStamp. > > > >I've left in the "at-risk" box. I've also left in the description of > >the datatype. This description would be removed if XSD becomes LC in > >time for us (and a note added to the post-LC appendix). > > > >As far as I can tell, the only other documents that refer to > >owl:dateTime are RDF Semantics and Profiles. I think that they only > >need to change the name. > > Yes, thanks! I have updated the RDF-Based Semantics. > > I found a small typo in the AtRisk note: It starts by > > "The name last-call datatype ''owl:dateTime''" > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I guess that either "name" or "last-call datatype" should be removed? Yes. I've fixed it. > A question: What about the facet "explicitTimezone", which was > mentioned in your original mail on this topic? Is this relevant for > OWL 2? Not relevant. XML Schema uses it but OWL doesn't need to reference it, as OWL only references xsd:dateTimeStamp. > Cheers, > Michael peter
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 20:35:54 UTC