- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:01:39 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 21 Jan 2009, at 23:54, Bijan Parsia wrote: [snip] > Second, I feel that "NF&R" shouldn't be an introduction to the new > features. That's scope creep. See my recent email for more on this. That came out sort of wrong. Obviously, it is an introduction to the new features. But I don't think it should be an introduction in the way that the primer is or the syntax (qua reference) is. It should be rationale centered. This is why the examples aren't really on point. They feel like more reference. We have a reference. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 00:02:14 UTC