- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:09:28 -0500 (EST)
- To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: msmith@clarkparsia.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Nope, at least as far as I can see, and, at the direction of the WG, I've already changed the document accordingly (ACTION-266). peter From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:08:46 +0000 > The "big club" clearly does the job, is easy to understand, and I > don't see any serious disadvantages -- am I missing something? > > Ian > > > On 7 Jan 2009, at 18:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > > > [Again, not an official reply.] > > > > It does appear to me that the rules for reverse mapping of sequences are > > not complete. Two lists that share an intermediate node can be > > (non-deterministically) accepted. This includes strange lists that loop > > back to themselves (and that also have a valid tail). > > > > A "big club" fix would be to have a global constraint along the lines > > of: > > > > No blank node can be used in more than once in these patterns. > > (This means that all lists are non-cyclic and do not share > > tails.) > > > > It might also be possible to have a more targetted fix, along the lines > > of the method used when parsing class expressions. > > > > peter > > > > > > > > > > From: "Mike Smith" <msmith@clarkparsia.com> > > Subject: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern > > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:53:10 -0500 > > > >> > >> While verifying some WebOnt test cases against the RDF to structural > >> mapping defined at [1], I noticed that there is no constraint > >> preventing variables within the sequence pattern from matching the > >> same node (see the second row of Table 3 at [1]). I found this > >> problematic, particularly when trying to avoid things like cyclic > >> lists (as in the nonconclusion ontology of [I5.5-006]). > >> > >> I believe that adding the constraint to the mapping document will > >> clarify the expected behavior. > >> > >> --Mike Smith > >> > >> Clark & Parsia > >> http://clarkparsia.com/ > >> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-mapping-to-rdf-20081202/#Mapping_from_RDF_Graphs_to_the_Structural_Specification > >> [I5.5-006] http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/TestCase:WebOnt-I5.5-006 > >> > >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:06:59 UTC