- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:56:57 +0000
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I notice when looking at the RDF documents that they split their references into Normative (i.e., those referenced normatively) and Informative. This was very helpful and I think we should emulate it. For example, in the syntax we have: """[OWL 2 XML Syntax] OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: XML Serialization...""" Not normative (in the sense that nothing in syntax depends *normatively* on the XML Syntax, not that XML syntax isn't normative for its domain). """[SROIQ] The Even More Irresistible SROIQ. Ian Horrocks, Oliver Kutz and Uli Sattler......""" Obviously not normative. """[XML] Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1...""" I don't know. It could be either. Ooo, and we don't want 1.1!!!!! """[XML Namespaces] Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition)....""" Maybe? """[XML Schema Datatypes] W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: """ Er...normative? but it's a working draft that says not to cite it... Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 19:53:31 UTC