public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org from February 2013 by thread

Fwd: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 Dr. David Filip (Thursday, 28 February)

Re: [ISSUE-102] I18N-ISSUE-242: Clarify case-insensitive match for domains [ITS-20] Norbert Lindenberg (Thursday, 28 February)

Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD) Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 27 February)

RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 27 February)

[Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76, Re: [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed Dr. David Filip (Wednesday, 27 February)

Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 Dr. David Filip (Wednesday, 27 February)

[Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed Dr. David Filip (Wednesday, 27 February)

issue-73 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - NLP Interchange Format (NIF) - 1.0/2.0, Canonical XML, Unicode Normalization Forms) Felix Sasaki (Friday, 22 February)

[Issue-70] Defined order of precedence missing inherited local values [Action-437] Dr. David Filip (Friday, 22 February)

Fwd: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) Dr. David Filip (Friday, 22 February)

Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list Somnath Chandra (Monday, 18 February)

Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list Dave Lewis (Monday, 18 February)

[ISSUE-79] Re: I18N-ISSUE-204: Use of namespaces and HTML [.prep-ITS-20]) [ACTION-393] Dave Lewis (Monday, 18 February)

edits to resolve MLW-LT issue-86 issue-90 issue-101 Felix Sasaki (Friday, 15 February)

Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] Norbert Lindenberg (Friday, 15 February)

MLWLT-issue-88 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD, i18n-ISSUE-211: Quote element in HTML) Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 14 February)

Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] Stephan Walter (Tuesday, 12 February)

Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 7 February)

Re: I18N-ISSUE-217: Missing support for localizable items that are not translatable [ITS-20] Norbert Lindenberg (Thursday, 7 February)

RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] Lieske, Christian (Tuesday, 5 February)

Re: [ISSUE-82] Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD, i18n-ISSUE-208: Mapping domains to nothing [ACTION-401] Dave Lewis (Sunday, 3 February)

Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] Dave Lewis (Sunday, 3 February)

Re: [ISSUE-108] locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-417] Dave Lewis (Sunday, 3 February)

issue-73, comment 3b Felix Sasaki (Sunday, 3 February)

Re: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax Dave Lewis (Sunday, 3 February)

Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) Dave Lewis (Sunday, 3 February)

Re: How to handle non HTML formats embedded in HTML (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML) Shaun McCance (Friday, 1 February)

RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML Mauricio del Olmo (Friday, 1 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2013 14:21:28 UTC