public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org from February 2013 by author

Anne van Kesteren

Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)

Dave Lewis

Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (Monday, 18 February)
[ISSUE-79] Re: I18N-ISSUE-204: Use of namespaces and HTML [.prep-ITS-20]) [ACTION-393] (Monday, 18 February)
Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (Monday, 11 February)
Re: [ISSUE-82] Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD, i18n-ISSUE-208: Mapping domains to nothing [ACTION-401] (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: [ISSUE-108] locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-417] (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Sunday, 3 February)

Dr. David Filip

Fwd: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Wednesday, 27 February)
[Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76, Re: [Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (Wednesday, 27 February)
[Issue-76] clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed (Wednesday, 27 February)
[Issue-70] Defined order of precedence missing inherited local values [Action-437] (Friday, 22 February)
Fwd: [Issue-68] Disambiguation (and term) (Friday, 22 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Friday, 22 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Wednesday, 20 February)

Felix Sasaki

Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD) (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD) (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Wednesday, 27 February)
RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 (Wednesday, 27 February)
issue-73 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - NLP Interchange Format (NIF) - 1.0/2.0, Canonical XML, Unicode Normalization Forms) (Friday, 22 February)
Re: [Issue-70] Defined order of precedence missing inherited local values [Action-437] (Friday, 22 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Friday, 22 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Wednesday, 20 February)
edits to resolve MLW-LT issue-86 issue-90 issue-101 (Friday, 15 February)
MLWLT-issue-88 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD, i18n-ISSUE-211: Quote element in HTML) (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (Monday, 11 February)
Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (Thursday, 7 February)
issue-73, comment 3b (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML (Friday, 1 February)

Fredrik Liden

RE: [Issue-70] Defined order of precedence missing inherited local values [Action-437] (Saturday, 23 February)

Jan Nelson

RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Tuesday, 5 February)

Jirka Kosek

Re: How to handle non HTML formats embedded in HTML (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML) (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML (Friday, 1 February)

Jörg Schütz

Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Wednesday, 27 February)

Lieske, Christian

RE: issue-73 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - NLP Interchange Format (NIF) - 1.0/2.0, Canonical XML, Unicode Normalization Forms) (Monday, 25 February)
RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Tuesday, 5 February)

Mauricio del Olmo

RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML (Friday, 1 February)
RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML (Friday, 1 February)
RE: Comment on ITS 2.0 WD-its20-20121206 - Inline global rules in XHTML (Friday, 1 February)

Norbert Lindenberg

Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: issue-113 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD) (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: [ISSUE-102] I18N-ISSUE-242: Clarify case-insensitive match for domains [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Friday, 15 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-217: Missing support for localizable items that are not translatable [ITS-20] (Thursday, 7 February)

Pablo Nieto Caride

RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Tuesday, 5 February)

Phil Ritchie

RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Tuesday, 5 February)

Sebastian Hellmann

Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (Wednesday, 20 February)

Shaun McCance

Somnath Chandra

Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (Monday, 18 February)

Stephan Walter

AW: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)
AW: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Friday, 22 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Tuesday, 12 February)

Yves Savourel

RE: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Wednesday, 27 February)
RE: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 2.a. [ACTION-434] (Wednesday, 27 February)
RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Friday, 22 February)
Re: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20] (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: [ACTION-385] Common regular expression syntax (Sunday, 3 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2013 14:21:28 UTC