- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:25:40 -0700
- To: "'Dr. David Filip'" <David.Filip@ul.ie>, "'Phil Ritchie'" <philr@vistatec.ie>
- CC: <public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org>
Hi David, Phil, all, To be honest I'm not sure why adding this item in the list of values for issue type would be a big problem. We are making much more demanding changes to the specifications in other places. Phil noted 2 possible users for the values, an when you look at http://www.w3.org/International/its/ig/its20-tool-specific-mappings.html (which lists the origin of the current type values), you can see several values that have only one declared 'user'. I think that value could be useful (as long as its difference with the Localization Quality Rating is well explained). cheers, -yves -----Original Message----- From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:55 AM To: Phil Ritchie Cc: Dave Lewis; public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - "conformance" Issue Type) Phil, trying to see if this has moved. There has been no traffic on this one as of Feb 5 and the meeting of Feb 6 seems only to have restated that the category would be produced and consumed between Digital Linguistics and Vistatec. While I am aware that this would formally provide two implementers, my impression is that this new value has not had sufficient traction. Any thoughts, comments? Thanks dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> wrote: > Dave > > Digital Linguistics will implement as "producer" and VistaTEC will > implement as "consumer". > > Phil. > > > > > > From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> > To: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org, > Date: 03/02/2013 19:59 > Subject: Re: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - > "conformance" Issue Type) > ________________________________ > > > > Hi Phil, > We need to reach a resolution on ISSUE-63, on the inclusion of the > suggested conformance type to the values for lqi type. > > As discussed on the 7th Jan call > (http://www.w3.org/2013/01/07-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item04), to advance > this we need to find another supporter who'd be willing to implement > this. Did you find anyone else interested in adding this type? > > I suggest we review the status of this on this wed (6th Feb) call, but > if we can find no one else who is interested then we reject this comment. > > cheers, > Dave > > > On 14/12/2012 16:49, Phil Ritchie wrote: > All > > Per sample output: > > !DOCTYPE html > <html> > <head> > </head> > <body> > <span its-loc-quality-issues-type="conformance" > its-loc-quality-severity="2.45">En outre, vous pouvez sélectionner > l'option capture d'écran, ce qui permet de prendre une capture d'écran > n'importe où dans Windows et l'insérer dans votre document.</span> > <span its-loc-quality-issues-type="conformance" > its-loc-quality-severity="1.46">Partage de documents a également été > améliorée, avec plusieurs personnes de travailler sur un document en > même temps en ligne, même si je n'étais pas en mesure de tester cette > fonctionnalité.</span> > <span its-loc-quality-issues-type="conformance" > its-loc-quality-severity="4.3">À l'instar des autres applications > Office 2010, Excel dispose de nouveaux outils pour le partage des > données avec d'autres personnes, y compris plusieurs personnes > travaillant sur un document à la fois.</span> > <body> > </html> > > Existing tools that would utilise the the error types are Review > Sentinel published by Digital Linguistics (http://www.digitallinguistics.com). > Implementation could be done by late February 2013. Also, the VistaTEC > Reviewer's Workbench as part of our deliverables. Some implementation > dependency upon mapping in Xliff. > > Phil. > > > > > > From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> > To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>, > Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > Date: 14/12/2012 09:46 > Subject: issue-63 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD - > "conformance" Issue Type) > ________________________________ > > > > Thanks, Phil. This is now issue-63. When we discuss this we need to > take the "stability aspect" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments > /2012Dec/0020.html > and the "existing tools" aspect > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments > /2012Dec/0004.html > See in the latter mail the part > "the other types where based on what existing tools or standards > initiatives produce. " > > Can you provide some input on that part? > > Thanks, > > Felix > > Am 14.12.12 08:27, schrieb Phil Ritchie: > I would like to propose the addition of "conformance" to Appendix C > (Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type). > > The values in the appendix cover specific and discrete classes of > error (putting "other" and "unintelligible" to one side). When you > start to apply new text classification based quality checking methods > to text several error classes may combine in subtle ways to produce a > measure of quality that is "aggregate" across error types but > none-the-less accurately indicative that something is wrong. For > example, a target sentence may be deemed to have poor conformance when > measured against a corpus of domain relevant reference translations. A > score would reflect this poor conformance but the underlying errors > within the sentence could be a mixture of grammar, spelling, style > and/or terminology. In such instances you may not need to explicitly > enumerate all of the combining errors and the extent of their contribution to the score, but just classify it under and umbrella term of "conformance". > > The proposed information for the "conformance" value would be as follows: > > Value > > conformance > > Description > > The content is deemed to have a level of conformance to a reference corpus. > Reflects the degree to which the text conforms to a reference corpus > given an algorithm which combines several classes of error type to > produce an aggregate rating. Higher values reflect poorer conformance. > > Example > > "The harbour connected which to printer is busy or configared not properly." > In a system which uses classification techniques this would be deemed > to have poor conformance. The poor conformance is a function of the > combined incorrect terminology, wrong spelling and bad grammar. > > Scope > > S or T > > Notes > > Reflects the degree to which the text conforms to a reference corpus > given an algorithm which combines several classes of error type to > produce an aggregate rating. Higher values reflect poorer conformance. > > Phil Ritchie > > > ************************************************************ > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the sender immediately by e-mail. > > www.vistatec.com > ************************************************************ > > > ************************************************************ > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the sender immediately by e-mail. > > www.vistatec.com > ************************************************************ > > > ************************************************************ > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the sender immediately by e-mail. > > www.vistatec.com > ************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:26:11 UTC