RE: [ISSUE-76]: clarification of "inconsistency" quality issue type needed, was: Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD [Action-392] Make the edit for issue 76 from Felix Sasaki on 2013-02-27 (public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:09:58 +0100
To: Verifika support <support@e-verifika.com>
CC: "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>, "public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <512DE986.6080100@w3.org>

Forwarded so that this reaches the lists.

- Felix

Am 27.02.13 12:07, schrieb Verifika support:
> Dear David,
>
> Yes, new category descriptions seems to be enough for our goals.
> Unfortunately, I have not found an example (that should be added to the description) to be sure.
> Thank you for the attention.
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 11:10:25 UTC